My Thesis

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

I’ve been putting this post off for a while for a couple of reasons: first, I was a little burned out and was enjoying not thinking about my thesis for a while, and second, I wasn’t sure how to tackle this post. My thesis is about eighty pages long all told, and I wasn’t sure [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 9:38 pm | 15 Comments »

Funner Grammar

Monday, October 1st, 2012

As I said in the addendum to my last post, maybe I’m not so ready to abandon the technical definition of grammar. In a recent post on Copyediting, Andrea Altenburg criticized the word funner in an ad for Chuck E. Cheese as “improper grammar”, and my first reaction was “That’s not grammar!” That’s not entirely [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 8:26 pm | 17 Comments »

It’s All Grammar—So What?

Tuesday, September 25th, 2012

It’s a frequent complaint among linguists that laypeople use the term grammar in such a loose and unsystematic way that it’s more or less useless. They say that it’s overly broad, encompassing many different types of rules, and that it allows people to confuse things as different as syntax and spelling. They insist that spelling, [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 10:57 am | 9 Comments »

Guest Post at Logophilius

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

Today I have a guest post about rules and style choices at Andy Hollandbeck's blog Logophilius. Go take a look, and while you’re there, check out the rest of his site.

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 9:59 am | No Comments »

Grammar and Morality

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Lately there’s been an article going around titled “The Real George Zimmerman’s Really Bad Grammar”, by Alexander Nazaryan. I’m a week late getting around to blogging about it, but at the risk of wading into a controversial topic with a possibly tasteless post, I wanted to take a closer look at some of the arguments [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 2:49 pm | 7 Comments »

Rules, Evidence, and Grammar

Sunday, March 4th, 2012

In case you haven’t heard, it’s National Grammar Day, and that seemed as good a time as any to reflect a little on the role of evidence in discussing grammar rules. (Goofy at Bradshaw of the Future apparently had the same idea.) A couple of months ago, Geoffrey Pullum made the argument in this post [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 11:33 am | 10 Comments »

More on That

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

As I said in my last post, I don’t think the distribution of that and which is adequately explained by the restrictive/nonrestrictive distinction. It’s true that nearly all thats are restrictive (with a few rare exceptions), but it’s not true that all restrictive relative pronouns are thats and that all whiches are nonrestrictive, even when [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 10:33 pm | 14 Comments »

Standards of Usage

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

Grammar is a poorly understood and much-maligned word. It’s usually used to mean the set of rules governing all aspects of language—a tedious and convoluted list of strictures and prohibitions telling us what we should and shouldn’t say or write. It’s a subject that most people do not like and one that they do not [...]

Posted by Jonathon Owen at 9:12 am | No Comments »