Archive for Usage

They and the Gender-Neutral Pronoun Dilemma

Monday, October 17th, 2011

A few weeks ago, as a submission for my topic contest, Bob Scopatz suggested I tackle the issue of gender-neutral pronouns in English. In his comment he said, “I dislike alternating between ‘he’ and ‘she’. I despise all variants of ‘he/she’, ‘s/he’, etc. I know that I should not use ‘they’, but it feels closest [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 3:24 pm | 18 Comments »

It’s Not Wrong, but You Still Shouldn’t Do It

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

A couple of weeks ago, in my post “The Value of Prescriptivism,” I mentioned some strange reasoning that I wanted to talk about later—the idea that there are many usages that are not technically wrong, but you should still avoid them because other people think they’re wrong. I used the example of a Grammar Girl [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 3:47 pm | 11 Comments »

Smelly Grammar

Monday, September 12th, 2011

Earlier today on Twitter, Mark Allen posted a link to this column on the Columbia Journalism Review’s website about a few points of usage. It begins with a familiar anecdote about dictionary maker Samuel Johnson and proceeds to analyze the grammar and usage of the exchange between him and an unidentified woman. Pretty quickly, though, [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 3:33 pm | No Comments »

The Value of Prescriptivism

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

Last week I asked rather skeptically whether prescriptivism had moral worth. John McIntyre was interested by my question and musing in the last paragraph, and he took up the question (quite admirably, as always) and responded with his own thoughts on prescriptivism. What I see is in his post is neither a coherent principle nor [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 8:30 pm | 2 Comments »

Does Prescriptivism Have Moral Worth?

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

I probably shouldn’t be getting into this again, but I think David Bentley Hart’s latest post on language (a follow-up to the one I last wrote about) deserves a response. You see, even though he’s no longer cloaking his peeving with the it’s-just-a-joke-but-no-seriously defense, I think he’s still cloaking his arguments in something else: spurious [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 11:49 pm | 9 Comments »

Who, That, and the Nature of Bad Rules

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

A couple of weeks ago the venerable John E. McIntyre blogged about a familiar prescriptive bugbear, the question of that versus who(m). It all started on the blog of the Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar, where a Professor Jacoby, a college English professor, wrote in to share his justification for the rule, which [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 12:23 am | 10 Comments »

Temblor Trouble

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

Last week’s earthquake in northern Japan reminded me of an interesting pet peeve of a friend of mine: she hates the word temblor. Before she brought it to my attention, it had never really occurred to me to be bothered by it, but now I can’t help but notice it and be annoyed anytime there’s [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 10:03 pm | 5 Comments »

Attributives, Possessives, and Veterans Day

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

As you’re probably aware, today is Veterans Day, but there’s a lot of confusion about whether it’s actually Veteran’s, Veterans’, or Veterans Day. The Department of Veterans Affairs obviously gets asked about this a lot, because it’s the top question in their FAQs: Q. Which is the correct spelling of Veterans Day? Veterans Day Veteran’s [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 9:38 pm | 8 Comments »

10:30 o’clock

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

My sister-in-law will soon graduate from high school, and we recently got her graduation announcement in the mail. It was pretty standard stuff—a script font in metallic ink on nice paper—but one small detail caught my eye. It says the commencement exercises will take place at “ten-thirty o’clock.” As far as I can remember, I’ve [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 9:53 pm | 9 Comments »

Not Surprising, This Sounds Awkward

Monday, October 12th, 2009

The other day at work I came across a strange construction: an author had used “not surprising” as a sentence adverb, as in “Not surprising, the data show that. . . .” I assumed it was simply an error, so I changed it to “not surprisingly” and went on. But then I saw the same [...]

Posted by Jonathon at 1:05 pm | 5 Comments »