<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Passive Voice Is Corrected by Buzzword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon</title>
		<link>http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Well, I managed to sign up for a trial of Buzzword, and it turns out that it has no grammar-checking abilities at all. The underlined text and marginal comment in the screenshot were a comment from a user, just like Word&#039;s commenting abilities.

Buzzword: 1
Jonathon: 0
The creator of that sample document: ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I managed to sign up for a trial of Buzzword, and it turns out that it has no grammar-checking abilities at all. The underlined text and marginal comment in the screenshot were a comment from a user, just like Word&#8217;s commenting abilities.</p>
<p>Buzzword: 1<br />
Jonathon: 0<br />
The creator of that sample document: ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon</title>
		<link>http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a full-on passive. Generally, [form of BE] + [past particple] = passive construction. And as for whether it &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; say that, well, that&#039;s a different issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a full-on passive. Generally, [form of BE] + [past particple] = passive construction. And as for whether it <i>should</i> say that, well, that&#8217;s a different issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pooka</title>
		<link>http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>pooka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arrantpedantry.com/2007/10/01/the-passive-voice-is-corrected-by-buzzword/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Should it say &quot;Buzzword fixed passive wording&quot;?  It&#039;s not a full on passive, but it is a passive participle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should it say &#8220;Buzzword fixed passive wording&#8221;?  It&#8217;s not a full on passive, but it is a passive participle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
